Jurisdiction

Seizure of evidence and preliminary taking of evidence

Securing and obtaining evidence is often critical to the success of legal proceedings.

Securing and obtaining evidence is often critical to the success of legal proceedings. With the enactment of the Evidence Law Simplification and Modernization Act on Jan. 1, 2025, civil evidence law will be radically modernized. This new legislation brings important improvements that make the practice of law more efficient and accessible. At Guldemond Lawyers, we are fully prepared for these changes and will be happy to advise you on the extensive possibilities under the new law.

Key points of the new legislation

The legislative amendment introduces four significant innovations that considerably affect the process of gathering evidence. First, it becomes possible to combine various evidentiary measures in a single request. Whereas separate proceedings were previously required for, for example, witness examinations and expert reports, these can now be consolidated into one application. This results in substantial savings in time and costs and makes the process more efficient.

In addition, the right to access documents is explicitly established and clarified. The law codifies the conditions under which parties are entitled to inspect documents held by the opposing party or by third parties. This enhances legal certainty and facilitates the disclosure of relevant documents, which can be essential to your case.

Another significant change is that the possibility of imposing evidentiary seizure – previously based primarily on case law – now receives an explicit statutory basis. This strengthens the position of parties who fear that crucial evidence may be lost or tampered with. With this legal codification, evidentiary seizure becomes a powerful instrument in civil procedural law.

Finally, the law emphasizes and strengthens the active role of the judge in matters of evidence. The judge is granted broader authority to engage with the parties regarding the facts and the presentation of evidence. This promotes more efficient and focused proceedings, allowing the judge to guide the process toward obtaining the necessary information for a fair and just decision.

Transitional law

For ongoing proceedings, transitional law is important. The new law applies to all proceedings initiated after 1 January 2025, as well as to appeal proceedings commencing after this date and follow-up proceedings in pending cases after this date. Proceedings started before 1 January 2025 will be settled under current law. It is therefore important to anticipate the changes in good time if you are considering starting proceedings or if your case continues into the new year.

Evidence seizure: securing crucial evidence

Evidence seizure is a powerful tool to secure relevant evidence before it can disappear or be manipulated. Under the new law, this practice, which previously developed in the courts, will have a firm legal basis. This provides greater clarity and certainty for parties seeking to secure evidence.

Evidence seizure can be placed on a wide range of materials, including physical documents and records, digital data carriers, e-mail boxes and servers, cloud storage and online accounts, business assets and products, and electronic equipment. This broad scope makes it possible to safeguard all relevant information, regardless of its form.

Several conditions must be met for evidence seizure. There must be an urgency; there must be a well-founded fear that the evidence will be lost, hidden or manipulated. In addition, the material to be covered must be defined in a concrete and specific manner. A generalized request is insufficient. Finally, you must show that you have a legitimate interest in securing the evidence, related to a (potential) legal proceeding.

The judicial officer plays a central role in the execution of evidence seizure. After obtaining leave from the preliminary injunction judge, the bailiff will place the attachment at the specified locations. In digital evidence seizures, the bailiff works with forensic IT specialists to secure data. The bailiff ensures the integrity of the evidence and manages it until the proceedings.

Digital evidence seizure: challenges and solutions

In today’s digital age, a significant portion of evidence exists in digital form. Securing such evidence presents specific challenges that require expertise and meticulous handling. The involvement of forensic IT specialists is crucial for the safe and reliable copying of digital data. Prior to collection, search terms and methodologies must be defined to ensure a targeted approach and to mitigate privacy risks. It is essential to preserve data integrity and to prevent any damage to the data during the process.

Privacy and data protection are key concerns. The privacy of individuals must be safeguarded in accordance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Confidential information, such as correspondence with legal counsel, must be excluded or shielded. In practice, this involves creating exact copies of storage media, securing email servers and cloud storage, and making forensic copies of databases without disrupting operational systems.

Right of inspection: access to relevant documents

The right of inspection is an essential tool for accessing relevant documents held by the opposing party or third parties. The new law clarifies and strengthens this right, making it easier to obtain the necessary information.

To successfully invoke the right of inspection, you must show that you have a concrete and legitimate interest in inspecting the documents. The request must be specific and focused on specific documents or categories of documents. Vague or general requests are rejected to prevent abuse. The right of inspection applies in the context of a legal relationship involving you. This term is interpreted broadly to include situations where you have a potential claim.

Even if these conditions are met, inspection may be denied on compelling grounds, such as trade secrets, privacy interests or confidential information. The judge weighs whether the interest in inspection outweighs the objections and whether less intrusive means are available. We help you formulate a strong request and anticipate possible counterarguments.

De rechter weegt af of het belang van inzage opweegt tegen de bezwaren en of er minder ingrijpende middelen beschikbaar zijn. This can be done prior to proceedings, as an independent request to strengthen your evidentiary position before you start proceedings. Even during an ongoing proceeding, the right of inspection can be used as an incident to the main case to obtain additional documents. In urgent cases, it is possible to seek injunctive relief through summary proceedings.

Preliminary evidence transactions: standing strong in your case

The new law significantly strengthens the possibilities for preliminary evidence transactions. This gives you the opportunity to strengthen your evidentiary position and better assess your litigation chances. With the change in the law, it is possible to combine several pieces of evidence in a single request, leading to more efficient litigation and cost savings.

The use of preliminary evidence operations requires a thoughtful strategy. It may be helpful to do this before the main case begins to assess your chances and possibly promote a settlement. Even during settlement negotiations, preliminary evidence transactions can serve as a means of pressure or clarification. In some cases, it makes sense to do this in parallel with other proceedings to obtain information that is useful in other cases.

A preliminary examination of witnesses is a powerful means of getting witnesses to testify under oath. This can help establish facts, strengthen your legal position and assess whether initiating proceedings is appropriate. We will guide you in selecting witnesses, formulating questions and preparing for the hearings.

For complex technical or financial issues, a preliminary expert opinion may be conclusive. An independent expert examines certain aspects and reports his findings. We advise you on the choice of expert, the assignment wording and the use of the report in your case.

In some cases, it is helpful for the court to assess the situation on the spot, for example, in construction disputes, disputes over the condition of property, or damage cases. We handle the practical organization of a site inspection and viewing and ensure that all relevant aspects are brought to your attention.

Read more updates

Want to collaborate with us?